Software Development 18 November 2024 11 min read

Svelte 5 Runes: The Future of Web Reactivity is Compiled

Svelte 5's runes system represents a fundamental rethinking of reactivity. Benchmarks show 2-3x faster startup and 60-80% smaller bundles than React. Here's why it matters.

SvelteJavaScriptReactivityFrontendWeb Development
Code on a computer screen showing syntax highlighting
Florian Olivo on Unsplash

On October 19, 2024, Svelte 5 shipped after 18 months of development. The release introduced runes—a new reactivity system that represents a fundamental rethinking of how we build interactive web applications. For those of us building data-intensive geospatial dashboards, the performance implications are significant.

The Svelte Compiler Advantage

Unlike React's runtime diffing or Vue's reactivity proxy system, Svelte compiles components directly to DOM manipulations. There's no virtual DOM, no reconciliation, no runtime overhead. The result is bundles as small as 3KB for basic applications—60-80% smaller than equivalent React applications.

This isn't theoretical. Benchmarks show Svelte 5 applications start 2-3x faster than React equivalents and update 15-30% faster under load. For real-time dashboards displaying sensor data or live geospatial feeds, this difference is perceptible.

What Are Runes?

Runes are special functions that explicitly opt into reactivity. Instead of Svelte's previous "magic" where any top-level let statement was reactive, runes make reactivity intentional:

runes-comparison.js
// Svelte 4 (implicit reactivity)
let count = 0;
$: doubled = count * 2;

// Svelte 5 (explicit runes)
let count = $state(0);
let doubled = $derived(count * 2);

$effect(() => {
  console.log('Count changed:', count);
});

Core Runes

$state()

Declares reactive state, replacing let for reactive variables

$derived()

Computed values that update when dependencies change

$effect()

Side effects that run when reactive values change

$props()

Component props with optional destructuring

$bindable()

Two-way binding for component props

Why the Change?

Svelte's previous implicit reactivity worked beautifully for small components but created confusion at scale. "Why didn't that update?" became a common debugging question. The magic was delightful until it wasn't predictable.

With Runes, Svelte made a hard choice—it sacrificed a tiny bit of its 'magic' for predictability. As apps got larger, the magic became confusing. Runes explicitly opt-in to reactivity, which makes the code clearer for both humans and the AI assistants helping us write it.
JavaScript Doctor, 2025

The explicit approach also enables better tooling. IDEs can now understand reactivity statically; refactoring tools work correctly; and TypeScript integration is significantly improved.

Performance Benchmarks

The Svelte team ran extensive benchmarks comparing runes to other reactivity systems. Svelte 5 outperformed all alternatives on most tests—including signals implementations in Solid, Vue, and Angular.

Benchmark Results

Startup

2-3x faster than React equivalents

Updates

15-30% faster due to compiled approach

Bundle size

60-80% smaller than React

Memory

Lower overhead without virtual DOM tree

Full SvelteKit app

Often under 50KB gzipped

React Comparison

The developer experience difference is stark. In React, you constantly ask: "Should this be memoized? Do I need useCallback? Should I wrap this in React.memo?" With Svelte, you write code. Because there's no virtual DOM diffing, updates compile to direct DOM instructions.

react-vs-svelte.js
// React: hooks and memoization decisions
const [items, setItems] = useState([]);
const filteredItems = useMemo(() =>
  items.filter(i => i.active), [items]);
const handleClick = useCallback(() =>
  setItems([...items, newItem]), [items]);

// Svelte 5: just write code
let items = $state([]);
let filteredItems = $derived(items.filter(i => i.active));
function handleClick() {
  items.push(newItem);
}

Market Position

React dominates in raw adoption—used by roughly 40% of developers, double Vue's usage. But Svelte leads in developer satisfaction. Stack Overflow used Svelte for their 2024 survey results site, a strong signal of trust in the framework's production readiness.

The hiring landscape reflects this divide: developers get paid to write React but enjoy writing Svelte. For teams prioritizing developer experience and performance over ecosystem size, Svelte 5 is increasingly compelling.

TC39 Signals Connection

There's growing interest in whether Svelte 5's reactivity could inform the TC39 Signals Proposal—a potential JavaScript language-level primitive for reactive state. If signals become part of JavaScript itself, Svelte's compiled approach positions it well to leverage native reactivity.

Our Perspective

We've migrated our dashboard and visualization work from React to SvelteKit over the past year. The productivity gains are real—less boilerplate, faster development, better performance. For data-intensive applications like our geospatial portals, the compiled approach means smoother animations and more responsive interactions.

The ecosystem is smaller than React's, which matters for some use cases. But for teams willing to occasionally build their own components rather than reaching for npm packages, Svelte 5 delivers a development experience that's hard to go back from.

Tell us about your project

Our Offices

  • Canberra
    ACT, Australia